Coolidge Blog

1924: The High Tide of American Conservatism

By Garland S. Tucker III     The following is adapted from Garland S. Tucker III’s new book, 1924: Coolidge, Davis, and the High Tide of American Conservatism (Coolidge Press). […]

A Misunderstood Decade

By John H. Cochrane     This article appears in the Winter 2024 issue of the Coolidge Review.   The 1920s were the single most consequential decade for the lives of […]

Casa Utopia: The Tale of an American Collective Farm

By Amity Shlaes     This review is from Amity Shlaes’s regular column “The Forgotten Book,” which she pens for “Capital Matters” as a fellow of National Review Institute.   […]

Coolidge Books for the Holidays

By Jerry Wallace   M. C. Murphy, Calvin Coolidge: The Presidency and Philosophy of a Progressive Conservative A new biography of Calvin Coolidge is certainly worth your attention. Mark C. […]

Coolidge’s Moral View of Economy

June 16, 2014

By John Hendrickson


A fundamental aspect of Calvin Coolidge’s philosophy was his refusal to separate economics from morality. He saw them as one and the same. This was especially true during Coolidge’s presidency. In a speech delivered to the Federation of Jewish Philanthropic Societies of New York he said that he regarded “a good budget as among the noblest monuments of virtue.”[i] Coolidge also believed that the issue of taxation was a moral issue. As he stated:

Realizing that the power to tax is the power to destroy, and that the power to take a certain amount of property or income is only another way of saying that for a certain portion of his time a citizen must work for the government, the authority to impose a tax on the people has been most carefully guarded.[ii]

The safeguard which Coolidge referred to was the constitutional mechanisms of checks and balances and separation of powers, which are foundational to the Constitution. Coolidge argued that:

These precautions have been taken because of the full realization that any oppression laid upon the people by excessive taxation, any disregard of their right to hold and enjoy the property which they have rightfully acquired, would be fatal to freedom.[iii]

Coolidge’s moral economic philosophy or “economy in government” was tied to his devotion to the Constitution. For Coolidge, keeping a budget in balance with reasonable tax rates was not just sound economic policy, but also both proper and constitutional. A limited federal government was not only the best economic policy for growth, but it was also moral in the sense that it protected economic liberty and the Constitution.

Coolidge also understood that economic policy could be abused and moved in an unconstitutional direction, which could threaten individual liberty. This was especially true with regard to excessive taxation and unchecked spending. That is why both Warren G. Harding and Coolidge made economy in government a pillar of their respective administrations. Coolidge warned:

A government which lays taxes on the people not required by urgent public necessity and sound public policy is not a protector of liberty, but an instrument of tyranny. It condemns the citizen to servitude. One of the first signs of the breaking down of free government is a disregard by the taxing power of the right of the people to their own property. It makes little difference whether such a condition is brought about through the will of a dictator, through the power of a military force, or through the pressure of an organized minority. The result is the same. Unless the people can enjoy that reasonable security in the possession of their property, which is guaranteed by the Constitution, against unreasonable taxation, freedom is at an end. The common man is restrained and hampered in his ability to secure food and clothing and shelter. His wages are decreased; his hours of labor are lengthened.[iv]

As Vice President under President Harding, Coolidge understood the difficult nature of the fight to implement economic policies rooted in limited government. In 1921 the Harding administration was confronted with a severe economic crisis, the depression of 1920-1921, which saw high unemployment rates and a major downturn in 298business. Harding’s response was to restore the economy by returning to constitutional principles, which meant slashing taxes and spending and paying down the national debt. Both Harding and Coolidge saw these policies as not only essential for returning prosperity to the national economy, but also as fundamental to preserving limited, constitutional government.

Coolidge described his pursuit of economy in government as “a full test of our national character,” saying it was “worthy of our highest endeavor.”[v] An out-of-control budget and high taxation were a major threat to the character of the nation. As Coolidge stated:

We must have no carelessness in our dealings with public property or the expenditure of public money. Such a condition is characteristic either of an undeveloped people, or of a decadent civilization. America is neither. It stands out strong and vigorous and mature. We must have an administration which is marked, not by the inexperience of youth, or the futility of age, but by the character and ability of maturity. We have had the self control to put into effect the Budget system, to live under it and in accordance with it. It is an accomplishment in the art of self government of the very highest importance. It means that the American Government is not a spendthrift, and that it is not lacking in the force or disposition to organize and administer its finances in a scientific way. To maintain this condition puts us constantly on trial. It requires us to demonstrate whether we are weaklings, or whether we have strength of character. It is not too much to say that it is a measure of the power and integrity of the civilization which we represent.[vi]

The pursuit of economy in government was an uncompromising goal that Coolidge achieved while president. “The very fact that the federal government has been able to cut down expenditures, decrease it indebtedness, and reduce its taxes indicates how great is the accomplishment which you have made in behalf of the people of the nation,” Coolidge held.[vii] The result was a sustained period of economic growth and expansion during the 1920s.

Coolidge also leaves us a warning today that if the federal government and the citizenry drift away from both economy in government and constitutional principles the result will be devastating:

One of the chief dangers to the success of popular government is that it will throw away self-restraint and self-control and adopt laws, which being without sound economic foundation, bring on such a financial distress as to result in want, misery, disorder, and the dissolution of society.[viii]

Coolidge’s leadership reminds us that budget and tax policy are as much a moral issue as an economic one.

[i] Calvin Coolidge, “Address delivered over the telephone from the White House to the Federation of Jewish Philanthropic Societies of New York City, October 26, 1924, in Foundations of the Republic,  University Press of the Pacific, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2004, p. 167.

[ii] Calvin Coolidge, “Address at the Seventh Regular Meeting of the Business Organization of the Government at Memorial Continental Hall, June 30, 1924, in Foundations of the Republic,  University Press of the Pacific, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2004, p. 40.

[iii] Ibid.

[iv] Ibid., pp. 40-41.

[v] Ibid., p. 41.

[vi] Ibid., pp. 46-47.

[vii] Calvin Coolidge, “Address at the Tenth Regular Meeting of the Business Organization of Government, Memorial Continental Hall, January 30, 1926,” in Foundations of the Republic,  University Press of the Pacific, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2004, p. 359.

[viii] Ibid., p. 362.

2 Responses to “Coolidge’s Moral View of Economy”

  1. michael mosley

    I love what you guys are doing to make sure that the amazing views of Calvin Coolidge stay readily available to the people looking for answers in these troubling times.

  2. This view of government and his attendant insistence on economy made Coolidge few friends in Washington—a fact illustrated by notes kept by White House usher Ike Hoover. These notes record the excuses given by lawmakers for not attending breakfasts hosted by Coolidge at the White House: “Senator Heflin: Regrets, sick. Senator Norris: Unable to Locate. Senator Pittman: Regrets, sick. Senator Reed, of Missouri: Regrets, sick friend.” But as unpopular as he was in Washington, Coolidge proved enormously popular with voters. In 1924, the Progressive Party ran on a platform of government ownership of public power and a return to government ownership of railroads. Many thought the Progressive Party might split the Republican vote as it had in 1912, handing the presidency to the Democrats. As it happened, Progressive candidate Robert LaFollette indeed claimed more than 16 percent of the vote. Yet Coolidge won with an absolute majority, gaining more votes than the Progressive and the Democrat combined. And in 1928, when Coolidge decided not to run for reelection despite the urging of party leaders who looked on his reelection as a sure bet, Herbert Hoover successfully ran on a pledge to continue Coolidge’s policies.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>